Development of a Training Program Management Model on Landscape Design under Digital Technologies at Universities in Hubei, China

Main Article Content

Dan Nie
Aree Ussavanuphap
Theeraphab Phetmalaikul

Abstract

Background and Aim: With the rapid advancement of digital technologies, traditional landscape design education faces increasing pressure to transform. In particular, the need for improved teaching effectiveness, integration of industry-standard tools, and project-based learning has grown significantly in Chinese higher education. This study aims to develop and evaluate a project management-based training model for landscape design under digital technologies, focusing on universities in Hubei Province. The objective is to enhance instructional strategies, align education with practical needs, and improve students’ technical and collaborative competencies.


Materials and Methods: The study employed a mixed-methods approach conducted in three phases. In Phase 1, a questionnaire survey involving 376 students and 158 teachers/administrators across 30 universities in Hubei was used to assess current conditions and expectations for digital landscape design training. In Phase 2, a project management model was constructed and tested using statistical tools such as Priority Needs Index (PNI), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modeling (SEM). In Phase 3, the model was evaluated through experimental teaching (n=50), independent sample t-tests, and expert focus group meetings to assess its effectiveness.


Results: The PNI analysis revealed significant gaps between the current and expected status of training in areas such as technical skills (PNI = 0.284) and communication (PNI = 0.273). SEM confirmed that project management positively influenced digital landscape teaching (β = 0.822), which in turn impacted student performance (β = 0.847). Experimental class students achieved significantly higher mean scores (85.76) than the control group (77.68), with p < 0.01. Expert interviews further validated the model’s effectiveness in improving learning outcomes, resource allocation, and teaching efficiency.


Conclusion: The proposed project management model under digital technologies significantly enhances the teaching and learning of landscape design in higher education. It addresses key deficiencies in current practices by promoting real-world application, digital fluency, and student engagement. The model offers a replicable framework for other institutions seeking to modernize landscape design education through structured, technology-integrated, and outcome-oriented strategies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nie, D., Ussavanuphap, A. ., & Phetmalaikul, T. . (2025). Development of a Training Program Management Model on Landscape Design under Digital Technologies at Universities in Hubei, China. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 5(6), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2025.7823
Section
Articles

References

Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.

Hussein, H. A. A. (2023). Integrating augmented reality technologies into architectural education: Application to the course of landscape design at Port Said University. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(4), 721–741.

Hutson, J., Lively, J., & Weber, J. (2022). In the studio with virtual reality: Student perceptions and potential integrations into art and design curriculum. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 21(2), 235–256.

Ika, L. A. (2009). Project success is a topic in project management journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6–19.

Jiang, R., Wang, L., & Tsai, S. B. (2022). An empirical study on digital media technology in film and television animation design. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–10.

Jiao, J., Liu, H., & Zhang, N. (2016). Research on the urban landscape design based on digital multimedia technology and virtual simulation. International Journal of Smart Home, 10(9), 133–144.

Jiawei, W., & Mokmin, N. A. M. (2023). Virtual reality technology in art education with visual communication design in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11826-z

Jin, H., & Yang, J. (2021). Using computer-aided design software in teaching environmental art design. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 19(S1), 173–183.

Jović, B. S., & Mitić, A. D. (2020). Exploration of nature-based biomimetic approach in landscape architectural design: Parametric study of candelabra model design. Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art, 3, Article 1.

Juan, Z., & Miaoyun, G. (2021, April). Landscape design and Hakka culture in the background of information and digital technology. In the 2021 International Conference on Internet, Education and Information Technology (IEIT) (pp. 44–47). IEEE.

Jumaat, N. F., Tasir, Z., Halim, N. D. A., & Ashari, Z. M. (2017). Project-based learning from a constructivist point of view. Advanced Science Letters, 23(8), 7904–7906.

Jun, Y., & Xian, S. X. (2020, November). Research on landscape design based on digital technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1651(1), 012071. IOP Publishing.

Kaleli, E., & Mutdogan, S. (2015). Interaction between design education: The example of “Edirne Workshop.” In International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2015 (pp. 477–484).

Kang, J., & Park, K. O. (2017). Development of evaluation indicators for hospice and palliative care professionals' training programs in Korea. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 37(1), 19–26.

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2010). Outline of the National Medium- and Long-term Education Reform and Development Plan (2010–2020).

National Development and Reform Commission. (2021). 14th Five-Year Plan for Digital Economy Development.

Zhao, J., & He, M. (2024). Review and prospect of the development of the theoretical system of Chinese landscape architecture. Landscape Architecture, 31(3), 17–26.