Innovative Models for University-Led Community Service: Strategies for Sustainable Development and Societal Empowerment
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Universities have evolved beyond their traditional roles of teaching and research to embrace a “third mission” centered on community engagement and social responsibility. In alignment with global frameworks such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), higher education institutions increasingly act as transformative agents in addressing social inequalities, advancing sustainability, and fostering community empowerment. This study aims to explore and synthesize innovative models of university-led community service globally. It seeks to identify effective strategies that foster sustainable development and societal impact, and to propose guiding principles for institutionalizing such models within diverse higher education contexts.
Methodology: Employing a qualitative documentary research design, the study analyzes a range of secondary data sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, institutional reports (e.g., from UNESCO and the Talloires Network), national higher education policies, and case studies from universities such as the University of Cape Town, Ateneo de Manila University, and Michigan State University. Data were thematically coded and organized using a comparative matrix focusing on engagement strategies, community impact, and sustainability mechanisms.
Results: The analysis identified four primary models of innovative university engagement: community-based learning/service-learning integration, university social enterprise incubators, research-to-impact translation centers, and digital community service platforms. Across diverse regions, successful initiatives shared common strategic features, including the institutionalization of civic engagement, long-term stakeholder partnerships, multidisciplinary collaboration, and dedicated funding and evaluation systems. These initiatives produced demonstrable outcomes in educational access, economic empowerment, public health, and environmental sustainability.
Conclusion: The study concludes that universities can serve as catalysts for sustainable development by embedding community engagement into their institutional missions and structures. However, to maximize impact and scalability, future research should empirically validate these models through longitudinal, cross-cultural, and participatory studies. Policy alignment and institutional reforms are also recommended to sustain university-community partnerships and amplify their societal contributions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining interdisciplinarity: Integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems. ANU Press.
Benneworth, P., & Cunha, J. (2015). Universities’ contributions to social innovation: Reflections in theory & practice. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(4), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2013-0099
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus–community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00273
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2009). Innovative practices in service-learning and curricular engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 13(1), 127–137.
Bringle, R. G., Clayton, P. H., & Price, M. F. (2009). Innovative practices in service-learning and curricular engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.356
Butin, D. W. (2006). The limits of service-learning in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 29(4), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2006.0025
Buys, N., & Bursnall, S. (2007). Establishing university-community partnerships: Processes and benefits. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800601175797
David, C. C. (2019). Higher education and community engagement in the Philippines: Lessons from the Ateneo de Manila University. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(3), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1616753
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where's the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass.
Finley, A. (2011). Civic learning and democratic engagement: A review of the literature on civic engagement in post-secondary education. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Furco, A. (2010). The engaged campus: Toward a comprehensive approach to public engagement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 58(4), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2010.527656
Furco, A., & Miller, W. (2009). Issues in benchmarking and assessing institutional engagement. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.357
Goddard, J. (2009). Re-inventing the civic university. NESTA.
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
Hall, B. L. (2011). Towards a knowledge democracy movement: Contemporary trends in community–university research partnerships. Rhizome Freirean, 9(2), 7–22.
Hart, A., & Northmore, S. (2011). Auditing and evaluating university–community engagement: Lessons from a UK case study. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00466.x
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
Jaramillo, R., & Melgarejo, M. (2013). Experiences in student-led community engagement in Mexico: The Universidad Veracruzana model. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(3), 49–66.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169
Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Brandli, L., & Rayman-Bacchus, L. (2019). Advancing the implementation of the SDGs: Presentation of a comparative model. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(6), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1627686
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. (2018). Implementing and operationalising integrative approaches to sustainability in higher education: The role of project-oriented learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4357–4366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.119
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. (2018). Sustainable development and higher education institutions: Acting with a purpose. Springer.
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. (2019). Integrative approaches to sustainable development at the university level: Making the Agenda 2030 a reality. Springer.
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. (2019). Sustainable development and higher education institutions: Acting with a purpose. Springer.
Lomas, J. (2007). The in-between world of knowledge brokering. BMJ, 334(7585), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39038.593380.AE
Mawonde, A., & Togo, M. (2019). Implementation of SDGs at the University of South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(1), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-1-2910
McCowan, T. (2019). Higher education for and beyond the sustainable development goals. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26157-3
McIlrath, L., & Lyons, A. (2012). Higher education and civic engagement: Comparative perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, P., & Bound, K. (2011). The Startup Factories: The rise of accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures. NESTA.
Mogalakwe, M. (2006). The use of documentary research methods in social research. African Sociological Review, 10(1), 221–230.
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
Preskill, H., & Jones, N. (2009). A practical guide for engaging stakeholders in developing evaluation questions. Mathematica Policy Research.
Pretty, J., Adams, B., Berkes, F., de Athayde, S. F., Dudley, N., Hunn, E., ... & Pilgrim, S. (2010). The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: Towards integration. Conservation and Society, 7(2), 100–112.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
Saltmarsh, J., Giles Jr., D. E., Ward, E., & Buglione, S. M. (2009). Rewarding community-engaged scholarship. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009(147), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.355
Sandmann, L. R., Thornton, C. H., & Jaeger, A. J. (2008). Institutionalizing community engagement in higher education: The first wave of Carnegie-classified institutions. New Directions for Higher Education, 2008(147), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.326
Tan, E., Chu, H. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Technology-supported community service learning in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3457–3482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09783-w
Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2007). The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.25223465
UBC. (2020). UBC Strategic Plan: Shaping UBC’s Next Century. University of British Columbia. https://strategicplan.ubc.ca
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0027
Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 702–727. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2010.0011
Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, M. Q. (2011). Getting to maybe: How the world is changed. Vintage Canada.
Zomer, A., & Benneworth, P. (2011). The rise of the university’s third mission. In J. Enders, H. de Boer, & D. Westerheijden (Eds.), Reform of higher education in Europe (pp. 81–101). Sense Publishers.
