Project Design and Learning of Interior Residential Space Based on 3D Cloud Platform Technology

Main Article Content

Jue Wei
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3246-5779
Thanawan Phongsatha
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3918-1796

Abstract

Background and Aim: Teaching residential interior design through conventional 3D drawing methods often presents challenges for beginner learners, particularly in visual communication, technical representation, and design integration. Although 3D cloud platforms provide innovative opportunities for project-based learning, their effectiveness in interior design education remains insufficiently validated. This study investigates the applicability of the Kujiale 3D cloud platform in residential space design courses and evaluates its impact on student design performance.


Materials and Methods: This study employed a mixed-methods approach involving 89 Environmental Art Design students selected through purposive sampling. Within a project-based learning (PBL) framework, participants utilized the Kujiale 3D cloud platform to complete residential design projects. Student performance was assessed across five dimensions: design creativity, visual representation, design drawings, sustainable design, and smart home integration. To examine students’ learning experiences and platform utilization, the study integrated Task–Technology Fit (TTF) and Learning–Technology Fit (LTF) theories to analyze the alignment between learning tasks and technological functions. Cognitive Affordance (CA) theory was further applied to evaluate usability and interaction support for design learning.


Results: The findings indicate that the Kujiale 3D cloud platform effectively enhances beginner students’ project performance in residential space design. Significant improvements were observed in visual representation, design drawings, and smart home integration. However, no statistically significant differences were found in design creativity and sustainable design performance. The platform demonstrated strong support for visualization, technical communication, and interactive learning processes within project-based design education.


Conclusion: This study confirms the suitability of the Kujiale 3D cloud platform for foundational interior design instruction. The findings provide empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of cloud-based 3D technologies in improving specific dimensions of student design performance. Furthermore, the integration of TTF, LTF, and Cognitive Affordance theories offers a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between technology, learning activities, and design outcomes. The study contributes valuable insights for educators and institutions seeking to integrate digital cloud technologies into contemporary design education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wei, J. ., & Phongsatha, T. . (2026). Project Design and Learning of Interior Residential Space Based on 3D Cloud Platform Technology. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 6(5), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2026.7998
Section
Articles

References

Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.

Arowoiya, V. A., Oke, A. E., Aigbavboa, C. O., & Aliu, J. (2020). An appraisal of the adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) elements for sustainable construction. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(5), 1193–1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-10-2019-0270

Bashabsheh, A. K., Alzoubi, H. H., & Ali, M. Z. (2019). The application of virtual reality technology in architectural pedagogy for building construction. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(2), 713–723.

Belwal, R., Belwal, S., Sufian, A. B., & Al Badi, A. (2020). Project-based learning (PBL): Outcomes of students’ engagement in an external consultancy project in Oman. Education + Training, 63(3), 336–359.

Cheng, Y.-M. (2022). Can tasks and learning be balanced? A dual-pathway model of cloud-based e-learning continuance intention and performance outcomes. Kybernetes, 51(1), 210–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2020-0440

Goel, L., Johnson, N. A., Junglas, I., & Ives, B. (2011). From space to place: Predicting users' intentions to return to virtual worlds. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 749–771.

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

Gunarathna, C., Yang, R., Wijeratne Mudiyanselage, P., Amarasinghe, G., Samarasinghalage, T., Weerasinghe, R. P. N., ... & Dev Sureshkumar Jayakumari, S. (2024). Project-based learning for proactive skills development of postgraduate students in solar energy building design digitalization. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(4), 828–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-08-2022-0173

Hamurcu, A., Timur, Ş., & Rızvanoğlu, K. (2020). An overview of virtual reality within industrial design education. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(6), 1889–1905. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2020-0048

Joy, E. R. A., & Raja, C. (2024). Digital 3D modeling for preconstruction real-time visualization of home interior design through virtual reality. Construction Innovation, 24(2), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-10-2020-0174

Leong, P. (2011). Role of social presence and cognitive absorption in online learning environments. Distance Education, 32(1), 5–28.

Li, X., Roh, M. I., & Ham, S. H. (2019). A collaborative simulation in shipbuilding and the offshore installation based on the integration of the dynamic analysis, virtual reality, and control devices. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 11(2), 699–722.

McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task–technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers and Education, 52(2), 496–508.

Murat, G. (2014). The project-based learning approach in environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.993169

Parrado-Martínez, P., & Sánchez-Andújar, S. (2020). Analyzing the importance of sustainable environmental practices in university students’ behavior: A multigroup analysis. Sustainability, 12(6), 2451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062451

Rajab, M., Chaudhry, A. R., & Herian, M. (2019). The development of 3D visualization and its potential impact on interior design and its clients. In 2019, Sixth HCT Information Technology Trends (ITT) (pp. 160–165). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITT48889.2019.9073067

Reychav, I., & Wu, D. (2015). Are your users actively involved? A cognitive absorption perspective in mobile training. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.074

Sanchez-Muñoz, R., Carrió, M., Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., & Moyano, E. (2020). A hybrid strategy to develop real-life competences combining the flipped classroom, jigsaw method, and project-based learning. Journal of Biological Education, 56(5), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1858928

Tetteh, L. A., Krah, R., Ayamga, T. A., Ayarna-Gagakuma, L. A., Offei-Kwafo, K., & Gbade, V. A. (2023). COVID-19 pandemic and online accounting education: The experience of undergraduate accounting students in an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(4), 825–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-07-2021-0242

Thavi, R., Jhaveri, R., Narwane, V., Gardas, B., & Jafari Navimipour, N. (2024). Role of cloud computing technology in the education sector. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(1), 182–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2021-0417

Zanbouri, K., & Navimipour, N. J. (2020). A cloud service composition method using a trust‐based clustering algorithm and a honeybee mating optimization algorithm. International Journal of Communication Systems, 33(5), e4259. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4259

Zhang, L. (2019). Virtual design method of interior landscape based on 3D vision. Open House International, 44(3), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-03-2019-B0010