The Impact of Science-Based Sufficiency Economy Immunity on Farmers’ Practice of the Three Core Principles and Two Conditions in Chiang Rai Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Integrating the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy (SEP) with the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF) is essential for promoting sustainable development among Thai farmers. This study investigated how five Science-Based Sufficiency Economy Immunity dimensions, Mind, Economy and Society, Learning Culture, Natural Resources and Environment, and Technology, influence farmers’ practice of Three Core Principles (Moderation, Rationality, and Immunity) and Two Conditions (Morality and Knowledge) in Chiang Rai Province.
Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, using qualitative data from documentary analysis, group discussions, and interviews, and quantitative data from structured questionnaires. The five-dimensional Science-Based Sufficiency Economy Immunity framework was used to assess internal factors affecting implementation.
Results: Findings revealed high levels of Science-Based Sufficiency Economy Immunity application, particularly in the Mind and Natural Resources and Environment dimensions. Regression analysis identified the Mind dimension as the strongest predictor (β = .572, p < .001), with the model explaining 49.7% of the variance in Science-Based Sufficiency Economy Immunity practice (Adjusted R² = .497).
Conclusion: Results highlight the importance of mental development, environmental stewardship, and lifelong learning. Policy recommendations emphasize community empowerment, participatory management, and capacity building. This integrated Science-Based Sufficiency Economy Immunity –SLF approach supports the SDGs by enhancing quality of life, income security, and sustainable self-reliance.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
Adenle, A. A., & Agboola, J. I. (2011). Relevant issues for sustainable agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. In J. I. Agboola (Ed.), Relevant perspectives in global environmental change (pp. 19-35). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/39063
Chanyapate, C. (2011). Sufficiency economy and sustainable development: The Royal philosophy in practice. Thailand Development Research Institute.
Charoenratana, S., Anukul, C., & Rosset, P. M. (2021). Food sovereignty and food security: Livelihood strategies pursued by farmers during the maize monoculture boom in Northern Thailand. Sustainability, 13(17), 9821. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179821
Chetri, P., Sharma, U., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2021). Role of information and ICTs as determinants of farmers’ adaptive capacity to climate risk: An empirical study from Haryana, India. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.09766
Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2015). Community-based natural resource management: Achieving sustainable development. Marine Policy, 61, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.06.003
Chulalongkorn University. (2021). Sustainability report. Retrieved from: https://www.sustainability.chula.ac.th
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Marks, D. (2011). Climate change and Thailand: Impact and response. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33(2), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs33-2d
Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. (2018). Situation for sufficiency economy to build human security. The Office.
Office of National Economic and Social Development Board & Crown Property Bureau. (2019). From the philosophy of sufficiency economy to practice for more than the 1st century. Dao Star Communication Publishing.
Office of the Education Council Secretariat. (2018). Educational reform and the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy. Ministry of Education.
Rigg, J. (2001). More than the soil: Rural change in Southeast Asia. Pearson Education.
Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
Suehiro, A. (2023, December). State modernization vs. social development: Two directions in Thailand’s development. In Y. Hayami (Ed.), Southeast Asian Studies, 12(Supplementary Issue), 5–41. Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.12.SupplementaryIssue_5
Sukwattanapong, P. (2014). Moral development and behavior change in rural communities. Journal of Social Development, 8(2), 77–89.
Tangthong, P. (2018). Mindfulness and community resilience: A study of rural development in Thailand. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(5), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21957
Tantivejkul, (2014). The philosophy of sufficiency economy: Interpretation and practice. Crown Property Bureau.
The Chaipattana Foundation. (n.d.). Philosophy of sufficiency economy. Retrieved from: https://www.chaipat.or.th
Unger, D. (2009). Political change and economic policy reform in Thailand. Asian Survey, 49(6), 1052–1070. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2009.49.6.1052
United Nations Development Programme. (2007). Thailand human development report 2007: Sufficiency Economy and human development. UNDP.
Wibulswasdi, P., Piboolsravut, P., & Pootrakool, K. (2006, November). Applying the sufficiency economy philosophy for balanced development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Sufficiency Economy, Bangkok, Thailand.