Research on the Internal Quality Assurance System of Singapore Education Based on the School Excellence Model
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Based on the Singapore School Excellence Model, this study aims to explore the content, characteristics, and effectiveness of the current internal quality assurance system in Singapore's education sector. The research seeks to analyze the connotation of the School Excellence Model through its two dimensions of "factors" and "effects," measured by nine quality standards, and to provide insights for other countries in constructing their internal quality assurance systems.
Materials and Methods: This study employed qualitative research methods, including comprehensive data analysis and case study analysis. First-hand data and information were collected from case study schools in Singapore. Subsequently, in-depth interviews were conducted with eight participants, including teachers, education professionals, and parents, to examine the Singapore School Excellence Model from multiple dimensions and analyze the characteristics of Singapore's internal quality assurance system in education.
Results: The study identified five key components of Singapore's internal quality assurance system: quality strategic assurance, quality input assurance, quality process assurance, quality outcome assurance, and quality mechanism assurance. The system demonstrates four distinctive characteristics: emphasizing independent decision-making of schools, comprehensively assessing cause-and-effect relationships, integrating excellence and forward-thinking approaches, and fostering close interaction between schools and society. The system effectively provides a solid foundation for comprehensive student development, enhances work efficiency, promotes continuous school improvement and characteristic development, and strengthens international competitiveness.
Conclusion: Singapore's School Excellence Model provides an effective framework for internal quality assurance through systematic integration of leadership development, strategic planning, and stakeholder engagement. To establish effective internal quality assurance systems, educational institutions should develop holistic evaluation frameworks, invest in leadership and teacher development, and strengthen collaborative partnerships with stakeholders. The Singapore experience demonstrates that successful internal quality assurance requires sustained commitment and careful adaptation to local contexts while maintaining student-centered excellence.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (1988). The self-managing school. Falmer Press.
Center on Educational Policy. (2003). From the capital to the classroom: Year one of the No Child Left Behind Act. Center on Educational Policy.
Chapman, C. (2001). Changing classrooms through inspection. School Leadership & Management, 21(1), 59–73.
Chen, L. M. (2019). Research on the internal quality assurance system of graduate education. Higher Education Research, 35(2), 45–52.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wilhoit, G., & Pittenger, L. (2017). Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 85. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2909
Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Qing, G., & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes (Research Report DCSF-RR108). University of Nottingham.
Deming, W. E. (2018). Out of the Crisis (Reissue ed.). MIT Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dimmock, C., & Tan, C. Y. (2013). Educational leadership in Singapore: Tight coupling, sustainability, scalability, and succession. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311311492
Gopinathan, S. (1974). Towards a national system of education in Singapore, 1945–1973. Oxford University Press.
Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.625111
Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
Huang, S., Liang, W., & Su, Y. (2019). The mediating role of school organizational characteristics in the relationship between school socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.005
Kwiatkowska-Sujka, M., & Piccinini, G. (2017). Enhancing internal quality assurance systems. European University Association.
Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. National College for School Leadership.
Matthews, P., & Sammons, P. (2004). Improvement through inspection: An evaluation of the impact of Ofsted's work. Ofsted.
McDonnell, L. M., & Weatherford, M. S. (2013). Evidence use and the Common Core State Standards movement: From problem definition to policy adoption. American Journal of Education, 120(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/673163
McKinney, S. E., Labat, M. B., & Labat, C. A. (2015). The relationship between Blue Ribbon Schools and leadership practices. Journal of School Leadership, 25(6), 1121–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500605
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2000). The School Excellence Model: A guide. Ministry of Education.
Mok, K. H. (2003). Similar trends, diverse agendas: Higher education reforms in East Asia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767720303907
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O’Connor, K. M., Chrostowski, S. J., & Smith, T. A. (2000). TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eighth grade. International Study Center, Boston College.
Ng, P. T. (2003). The Singapore school and the School Excellence Model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024734424387
Ng, P. T., & Chan, D. (2008). A comparative study of Singapore’s School Excellence Model with Hong Kong’s school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 488–505. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810895444
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Rahminawati, N., & Supriyadi, T. (2023). Implementing an internal quality assurance system to enhance elementary school education quality. International Journal of Educational Research, 118, 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102115
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Smith, J. (2015). Educational competition and collaborative learning: Balancing excellence with equity. Journal of Educational Policy, 30(4), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1017862
Tan, J. (1998). The marketisation of education in Singapore: A critical survey. Comparative Education, 34(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069828290
Teh, L. W., & Koh, C. (2018). Singapore’s School Excellence Model: A framework for organizational learning and improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216684131
Tychonievich, L. A. (2012). Principles and practice of peer assessment. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 44(1), 397–402.
U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1177
UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656
UNESCO. (2017). Internal quality assurance: Enhancing higher education quality and graduate employability. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000259459
United States Department of Education. (2019). Blue Ribbon Schools program: A brief history. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/nclbbrs/index.html
Wartini, S., Sauri, S., & Suherman, A. (2020). Implementation of the internal quality assurance system in improving the state primary school culture. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.10
Yuan, X. B. (2003). Internal quality assurance system in higher education institutions. Higher Education Research, 24(3), 25–31.
