ENHANCING GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION THROUGH TEACHING MEDIA: EVIDENCE FROM CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IN LAO SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Authors

  • Lopphalak OUTHITPANYA Department of Geography-History, Pakse Teacher Training College, Lao PDR.
  • Bounmy KEOHAVONG Souphanouvong University, Lao PDR.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/aelr.2026.10

Keywords:

Teaching Media, Student-Centered Learning, Classroom Action Research, Geography Education, Instructional Innovation, Student Satisfaction

Abstract

This study aimed to improve geography teaching and learning management in Lao secondary schools by promoting the integration of teaching media, encouraging student-centered approaches, and identifying strategies for instructional improvement. A classroom action research design was implemented with geography students. Data collection involved classroom assessments and student feedback surveys. Descriptive statistics (means and percentages) were used to evaluate teaching activities, preparation and use of media, types of media employed, instructional techniques, student satisfaction, and assessment practices—the integration of teaching media in geography lessons produced positive outcomes. Student learning performance was rated “very good” according to the evaluation criteria. Student feedback indicated consistently high satisfaction across seven dimensions. Assessment and evaluation were rated highest, followed by organization of learning activities. The lowest-rated aspect was the use of electronic media, though it was still considered satisfactory. The findings demonstrate that media use substantially enhances student engagement, satisfaction, and performance in geography education. The study highlights the pedagogical value of integrating diverse teaching media. It emphasizes the need to expand the use of electronic resources to strengthen digital learning capacity in resource-limited contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Demas, A., Naka, E., & Mason, J. (2018). The Learning Crisis in Lao PDR: Challenges and Policy Priorities. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher Technology Change: How Knowledge, Confidence, Beliefs, and Culture Intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). California: SAGE Publications.

Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2018). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Gutiérrez-Colón, M., & Somsivilay, P. (2021). English as a Foreign Language: Listening to Students and Teachers, a Case Study in LAO PDR. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 535-550.

Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. In C. Reigeluth (ed.). Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. II, pp. 215-239). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7(4), 396-403.

Kadhim, A., & Cochrane, T. (2025). Exploring the real impact of ICT tools on secondary school students' learning of geography. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(1), 1-17.

Kay, R., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819-827.

Kerski, J. (2015). Geo-awareness, geo-enablement, geotechnologies, citizen science, and storytelling: Geography on the world stage. Geography Compass, 9(1), 14-26.

Kilpatrick, A., Bouphavanh, K., Sengchanh, S., Namvongsa, V., & Gray, A. (2019). Medical Education in Lao People’s Democratic Republic: The Challenges Students Face in Accessing Learning Resources. The Asia Pacific Scholar, 4, 39-47.

Kozma, R. (2003). Technology and Classroom Practices: An International Study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.

Lim, C., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, C., & Tsai, C. (2013). Bridging the Gap: Technology Trends and Use of Technology in Schools. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59-68.

Mayer, R. (ed.). (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Memon, M., Lu, Y., Memon, A., Memon, A., Munshi, P., & Shah, S. (2022). Does the Impact of Technology Sustain Students’ Satisfaction, Academic and Functional Performance: An Analysis via Interactive and Self-Regulated Learning?. Sustainability, 14(12), 7226.

Ministry of Education and Sports. (2020). General education curriculum reform framework 2020-2030. Vientiane: Lao PDR Ministry of Education and Sports.

Molnar, A., & Kearney, R. (2017). A Comparison of Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous and Synchronous Discussions in an Online Dental Hygiene Course. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 91(3), 14-21.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326.

Nanthalangsy, P., Massena, C., & Singphan, P. (2025). Laos' Educational Transformation: Towards Digital Learning. UBRU International Journal Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 5(1), 67-72.

Nietschke, Y., & Dabrowski, A. (2023). Technology in education: A case study on Lao People's Democratic Republic. (Global Education Monitoring Report No. ED/GEMR/MRT/2023/P1/06) Paris: UNESCO.

Oo, Z., Adams, D., Pov, S., & Nguyen, N. (2025). Shaping leadership and inclusive education: insights from Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 71(6), 824-836.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Robots. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2021_589b283f-en.html.

Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS. London: McGraw-Hill.

Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., & Podsakoff, N. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.

Riyadi, S., & Arif, N. (2025). The Effectiveness of Using Google Earth Interactive Media on Geography Learning Outcomes. Journal of Learning Improvement and Lesson Study, 5(1), 85-97.

Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real world research (4th ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

Staneviciene, E., & Žekienė, G. (2025). The Use of Multimedia in the Teaching and Learning Process of Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 17(19), 8859.

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (eds.). (2011). Cognitive load theory. Berlin: Springer.

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189-1209.

United Nations Children's Fund. (2024). Teachers’ digital literacy in the East Asia and Pacific region: Spotlight on Cambodia, China, Lao PDR, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/eap/media/16211/file/Final%20Teachers%20Digital%20Literacy%20NEW.pdf.pdf.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/en/articles/education-sustainable-development-goals-learning-objectives.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2023: Southeast Asia—Technology in education: A tool on whose terms?. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/en/articles/global-education-monitoring-report-2023-southeast-asia-technology-education-tool-whose-terms-summary.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321.

Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A Call to Action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4-14.

Published

2026-05-17

How to Cite

Outhitpanya, L. ., & Keohavong, B. (2026). ENHANCING GEOGRAPHY EDUCATION THROUGH TEACHING MEDIA: EVIDENCE FROM CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH IN LAO SECONDARY SCHOOLS. Asian Education and Learning Review, 4(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.14456/aelr.2026.10