How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges

Ding  Jianyi; Thongchat  Phucharoen

doi:10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3072

Authors

Ding Jianyi Faculty of Sports Science and Technology, Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-4369
Thongchat Phucharoen Faculty of Sports Science and Technology, Bangkokthonburi University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2601-7755

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3072

Keywords:

College Physical Education (CPE); , Collaborative Governance; , Indicator System; , Delphi Method

Abstract

Background and Aim: College physical education (CPE) is a Key Stage in the transition from school physical education to national sports. Collaborative governance is an effective new type of social participation, but there is not much research on CPE collaborative governance. The purpose of this study is to describe the interrelationship of multiple subjects in the College Physical Education (CPE) collaborative governance and explore the specific influencing factors that affect the effect of CPE collaborative governance.

Materials and Methods: This study uses the Delphi method. A total of 18 experts conducted two rounds of expert consultation questionnaires with the Delphi method and completed the CPE Collaborative Governance Scale. The scale includes four dimensions: Government-led multi-sectoral coordination, CPE internal governance, and external synergy, System design of CPE collaborative governance, and Mechanism construction of CPE collaborative governance. Three criteria for the inclusion of experts have been established, including educational background, professional title, and management experience, ensuring the authority of experts.

Results: The theoretical model of CPE collaborative governance constructed shows the interrelationships among multiple subjects of CPE. The four dimensions of collaborative governance in college physical education are government-led multi-sector collaboration, internal governance and external collaboration of CPE, the institutional design of CPE collaborative governance, and the mechanism construction of CPE collaborative governance. The results show that after the expert consultation and verification of the Delphi method, the 4 Indicator Dimensions and 28 Specific Items in the revised CPE collaborative governance Indicator System have significance and reference value for CPE collaborative governance.

Conclusion: The relationship between multiple subjects of CPE collaborative governance revealed in this study, as well as the quantified and validated indicators of collaborative governance effectiveness, have certain reference values for CPE to carry out collaborative governance work. CPE managers can use the results of this study to carry out CPE collaborative governance work based on the current situation.

References

Cao, Z.B., Chen, P.J., Zhuang, J., Liu, Y., Wang, L., & Han, J. (2017). Development of sports health policies in developed countries and its implications for healthy China. Sports Science, 37 (05), 11-23.

De, B., H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. Springer Netherlands, 137-152.

Donahue, J. (2004). On collaborative governance. Corporate social responsibility initiative Working Paper.

Du, J.J. (2019). Research on multi-agent collaborative governance of youth physical exercise. Shandong University.

Kern, M.A., & Smutko, L.S. (2021). Collaborative governance: The role of university centers, institutes, and programs. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 39(1), 29-50.

Li, L.H., Wang, J., Gao, K.T., & et al. (2021). The practical dilemma and path choice of school sports governance in China under the background of deepening the integration of sports and education. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Physical Education, 36(5), 520-527.

Li, R.J. (2016). Feasibility analysis and path exploration research on WeChat to promote healthy interaction in CPE classes. Sports Culture Guide, 165(3), 148-152.

Li, Y., & Luo, B.Q. (2022). Research on the Motivation, Difficulties, and Implementation Paths of the Integration of Sports and Education. New Era Sports Science, (2), 30-38.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.

Liu, H.C. (2013). Research on the interaction between CPE and community sports. Beijing Sport University.

Liu, H.D., & Li, N.N. (2020). Cultural differences and subjective cognition: an insurmountable gap between sports and education. Sports and Science, 41(5), 36-42.

Liu, H.J., & You, C.B. (2017). The evolution of British youth sports policy in the new century, beneficial experience, and local enlightenment. Journal of Nanjing Institute of Sports (Social Science Edition), 31(4), 5-13.

Liu, M.Y., Gong, H.P., Hu, Y.J., & et al. (2020) Integration of sports and education: mission of the times, international mirror, China plan. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 54 (10), 5-14.

Liu, M.Y., Kong, N.X., Gong, H.P., & et al. (2020). The new direction of the integration of sports and education: youth health promotion and sports reserve talent training. Sports Science, 40 (10), 8-20.

Ma, D.H. (2020). From fragmentation to integration - On the collaborative governance of school, community and family sports in China. China Sports Science and Technology, 56(3), 46-54.

Ouyang, J.F., Xing, J.M., & Yue, X.B. (2021). Research on the new habitat composition, organizational form, and system design of "integration of sports and education". Journal of Shenyang Institute of Physical Education,40(2), 37-43.

Shu, Z.L. (2016). Cultivation and development of community youth sports social organizations under the national strategy of national fitness for all. Sports Science, 36(6), 3-10.

Tian, P.J. (2013). Collaborative governance: theoretical research framework and analytical model. Shanghai Jiaotong University.

Wang, X.M., Wang, J., Lu C.F., Luo, X.B., & Dong, G.Y. (2019). Research on the difficulties, foreign experience, and development strategies of the integration of school, community, and family sports. Journal of Chengdu Institute of Physical Education, 45(3), 112-118.

World health organization. (1986). The Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, Copenhagen. Ottawa: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Wu, H.T., & Ji, L. (2013). The evolution of school physical education paradigm in China's modern and modern times - a sociological perspective. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 36(6), 109-114.

Xie, Y.X. (2013). Building community, school, and family youth sports networks based on community sports clubs. Fujian Normal University.

Xu, H., & Li, X.X. (2021). The dilemma and thinking of youth sports activities in the context of integration of sports and education. Journal of Sports,28(2), 7-12.

Yang, G.Q. (2021). The practical dilemma and countermeasures of China's integration of sports and education. Journal of Chengdu Institute of Physical Education, 47(1), 1-6.

Yang, G.Q., & Liu, Y.J. (2020). On the connotation concept and implementation path of the integration of sports and education in the new era. Journal of Tianjin Institute of Physical Education, 3(6), 621-625.

Yang, H., & Liu, Z.G., (2021). Integration of sports and education: transformation and innovation of reserve talent cultivation mode of competitive sports with Chinese characteristics. Journal of Chengdu Institute of Physical Education, 47(3), 1-8.

Yang, S.J., & Liu, B. (2021). Realistic demand, practical path, and guarantee mechanism of deepening the integration of sports and education to promote the physical health of teenagers. Journal of Xi'an Institute of Physical Education,38(3), 366-371.

Yang, Y.W., & Wu, Y.Z. (2021). Realistic review and strategic orientation of youth sports reserve talent cultivation in the context of integration of sports and education. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 55(1), 80-86.

Yang, Y.X., Hao, D.F., Liu, H., & Liu X. (2020). Analysis of the integration of sports and education in the perspective of the whole life cycle. Journal of Beijing Sport University, 43 (12), 11-21.

Zhang, J.L., Tang Y., Chen P.J., & et al., (2017). Research on physical activities of urban children and adolescents in China from a global perspective: taking Shanghai as an example. Sports Science, 37(1), 14-27.

Zheng, B., Luo, J., Zhang, C., Zhang T.R., & Wang, X. (2015). Model construction of a long-term mechanism for school, family, and community integration to promote youth sunshine sports activities. Journal of Sports,22(2), 63-71.

Zhou, A.G. (2021). Reflections on my country's school physical education reform under the background of integration of sports and education. Journal of Physical Education (2), 1-6.