Development of College English Listening and Speaking Course Based on an Outcome-Based Education Approach Combined with Blended Learning to Enhance English Listening and Speaking Skills of Non-English Major Freshmen Students at Xi’an University

Liu Xiuling
China
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0521-2642
Sombat Kotchasit
Thailand
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8057-7656
Phithack Nilnopkoon
Thailand
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6063-9830
Keywords: College English Listening and Speaking Course; , Outcome-Based Education Approach; , Blended Learning; , English Listening Skills; , English Speaking Skills
Published: Nov 10, 2024

Abstract

Background and Aim: This study was a research and development of a College English Listening and Speaking Course. The objectives of this research were 1) To study the background information focusing on course components and existing problems of the College English Listening and Speaking Course. 2) To develop the components and quality of the College English Listening and Speaking Course based on an outcome-based education approach combined with blended learning. 3) To study the effectiveness of implementing College English Listening and Speaking Course based on outcome-based education combined with blended learning to enhance English listening and speaking skills of non-English major students.


Materials and Methods: The sample of this study was 40 non-English major freshmen students from Xi’an University, the People's Republic of China. They were derived by cluster random sampling. The instruments used in this research were 1) College English Listening and Speaking Course based on the outcome-based education approach combined with blended learning and its lesson plans, 2) English listening skills test with .88 of reliability, and 3) English speaking skills test with .74 of reliability 4) students’ satisfaction questionnaire with .79 of reliability. The statistics used to analyze data included mean, standard deviation, and t-test for one sample.


Results: The research results found that 1) the background information of the College English Listening and Speaking Course and its current problems were principles, objectives, content, instructional strategy, media, and resource evaluation. 2) College English Listening and Speaking Course based on outcome-based education approach and blended learning consisted of 6 steps, that is, Step 1: Determine expected learning outcomes (OBE) Step 2: Design teaching activities(OBE) Step 3: Design teaching methods (blended learning) Step 4: Design teaching assessments (OBE and blended learning) Step 5: Continuous feedback and adaptation (OBE) Step 6: Reflection and improvement (OBE and blended learning) 3) the results of implementation of College English Listening and Speaking Course based on outcome-based education approach combined with blended learning found that (1) Students’ English listening skills after using outcome-based education approach combined with blended learning method was higher than before at a statistically significant level of .01 (M=24.35, SD=2.46). (2)Students’ English speaking skills after using an outcome-based education approach combined with the blended learning method were higher than before at a statistically significant level of .01 (M=24.35, SD=2.46). (3)The satisfaction of students after using the outcome-based education approach combined with the blended learning method was at a higher level (M=4.11, SD=0.64).


Conclusion: The developed College English Listening and Speaking Course based on an outcome-based education approach combined with blended learning has a significant effect on enhancing the English listening and speaking skills of non-English major students at Xi’an University. Students are satisfied with the developed College English Listening and Speaking Course based on an outcome-based education approach combined with blended learning.

Article Details

How to Cite

Xiuling, L. ., Kotchasit , S. ., & Nilnopkoon, P. (2024). Development of College English Listening and Speaking Course Based on an Outcome-Based Education Approach Combined with Blended Learning to Enhance English Listening and Speaking Skills of Non-English Major Freshmen Students at Xi’an University. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 4(6), 439–454. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.4851

Section

Articles

References

Bachman, L.F., & Palmer, A.S. (2010). Language Assessment in Practice: Developing Language Assessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L.F., & Palmer, A.S. (2018). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.

Brown, H.D. (2007). Listening Skills: Macro and Micro Perspectives. In Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education.

Buck, G. (2016). “I Wanted to Feel the Way They Did”: Mimesis as a Situational Dynamic of Peer Mentoring by Ex-Offenders. Deviant Behavior, 38, 1027-1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1237829

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Snow, A. (2014). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. 4th edition, Boston, MA: Heinle ELT.

Chapelle, C.A., & Voss, E. (2016). Assessing language through computer technology. Cambridge University Press.

Chen, G. (2015). The Laboratory Construction and Practice Based on Outcome Based Education. Laboratory Science and Technology, 3, 12-14.

Chen, J.L. (2016). Research on Modern Foreign Language Teaching: Theory and Method. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Christensen, C.M., & Horn, M.B. (2008). Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. McGraw-Hill Education.

College English Curriculum Requirements Project Group. (2004). College English Curriculum Requirements (Trial). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education. (2007). College English Teaching Curriculum Requirements. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let's get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1-4.

Felder, R.M. (2016). Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes. Wiley

Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2016). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25.

Feng, X.Y. (2018). A review of domestic and international research on blended learning: Based on the analysis framework of blended learning. Journal of Distance Education, 36 (3), 13-24.

Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language students’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55-75.

Goh, C., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. Cambridge University Press.

Graham, C.R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definitions, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Hockly, N., & Clandfield, L. (2013). Teaching Online: Tools and techniques, options and opportunities. Delta Publishing.

Horn, M.B. (2015). Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. Jossey-Bass.

Jiang, B. (2003). OBE: Education based on results. Foreign Education Research, 3, 35-37.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Smith, K. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory. In: Davidson, N., Major, C. and Michaelsen, L., Eds., Small-Group Learning in Higher Education: Cooperative, Collaborative, Problem-Based and Team-Based Learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(4). http://personal.cege.umn.edu/~smith/docs/Johnson-Johnson-Smith-Cooperative_Learning-JECT-Small_Group_Learning-draft.pdf

Khan, S. (2012). The practice of English language teaching. 4th edition. Essex: Pearson Education

Li, Y. (2016). A Study on Course Design Based on Outcome Based Education. China Educational Technology, 10, 20-22.

Luoma, M., & Uotila, T-P. (2017). Unfolding strategic partnership: An analysis of the CEOs’ and HR directors’ perceptions of TMT work. Conference: Strategic Management Society, Special conference, At Milan

Mayadas, A.F., & Picciano, A.G. (2007). Blended learning and localness: The means and the end. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11, 3-7.

Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5, 313.

Nan, Guo-nong. (2010). The necessary solution for education modernization is the Assay collection of Nanguo agricultural electricity education. Higher Education Press.

Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston:Heinle & Henle Publishers.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. International Edition, McGraw-Hill, Singapore,

Ralph W. Tyler. (1994). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. (F. L. Shi, Trans.). Beijing: People’s Education Press.

Richards, J.C., & Bohlke, D. (2015). Four Corners Level 4 Student's Book with Self Study CD ROM. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. 2nd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Skehan, P. (2019). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.

Spady, W. G. (1998). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Spady, W.G. (2013). Organizing for results: The basis of authentic restructuring and reform. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 4-8.

Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended Learning Models, Learning Circuits. Retrieved from http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/aug2002/valiathan.html.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2012). The Understanding by Design Guide to Advanced Concepts in Creating and Reviewing Units. ASCD,

Wigglesworth, G. (2018). Remote Indigenous education and translanguaging. TESOL in Context. 29 (1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2020vol29no1art1443