Strategies and Practical Research on the Transformation of Industrial Heritage into Age-Friendly Communities in the Context of Post-Industrialization: A Case Study of Nanjing 1865 Creative Industry Park

Main Article Content

Leiyin Chen
Sarawuth Pintong

Abstract

Background and Aim: China’s rapidly aging society necessitates the development of age-friendly communities. This study investigates the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for such communities, using Nanjing 1865 Creative Industry Park as a case study. Anchored in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) age-friendly cities framework and universal design principles, the research bridges the underexplored intersection of heritage preservation and elderly well-being.


Materials and Methods: Adopting a mixed-methods approach—surveys, interviews, and participatory design workshops—the study directly engaged elderly stakeholders to identify their needs. Participatory design, defined here as co-creating solutions with older adults, ensured their priorities shaped spatial and functional outcomes.


Results: Adaptive renovations, including barrier-free pathways, outdoor communal areas, and safety enhancements, transformed industrial heritage into accessible, socially cohesive spaces. The integration of historical and cultural elements (e.g., exhibitions, community events) fostered cultural engagement and intergenerational interaction, addressing the elderly's needs for social connectivity and belonging.


Conclusion: The Nanjing 1865 case validates the feasibility of merging industrial heritage reuse with age-friendly goals. However, limitations such as localized sampling and scalability challenges warrant further exploration. The findings offer policy insights for post-industrial cities, advocating participatory frameworks and heritage-sensitive design to balance cultural preservation with elderly well-being.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chen, L., & Pintong, . S. . (2025). Strategies and Practical Research on the Transformation of Industrial Heritage into Age-Friendly Communities in the Context of Post-Industrialization: A Case Study of Nanjing 1865 Creative Industry Park. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 5(5), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2025.6542
Section
Articles

References

Bae, S., Kim, Y., & Lee, H. (2021). Virtual reality-based participatory design for age-friendly communities: The Ageing@Home platform. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126395

Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Viking Press.

Chen, L. (2021). Research on strategies for the renewal and reutilization of modern industrial heritage. Master’s thesis, Anhui University of Engineering.

Chen, L., & Wang, H. (2022). Four-stage model for industrial heritage transformation: Evidence from Shanghai’s Bincuan Road Electromechanical Area. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103432

Chen, L., Liu, X., & Wang, Q. (2020). Health-oriented regeneration of industrial heritage: The Boston Innovation and Design Building project. Cities, 105, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102853

Gong, K., & Ji, Y. (2010). Investigation and research on the transformation of Nanjing industrial architecture heritage—Taking 1865 Creative Industrial Park as an example. Journal of Architecture, 12, 29–32.

Hong, C. (2023). Research on the renewal of community communication space under the concept of “age-friendliness”. Master’s thesis, Hangzhou Normal University.

Hong, S. (2023). Bridging the digital divide in co-design: A case study of intergenerational collaboration in Oslo. Design Studies, 84, 101215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101215

International Committee for the Conservation of the Industrial Heritage (TICCIH). (2003). The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage. International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS). https://ticcih.org/about/charter/

Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619–674). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10044-020

Liu, X., Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2020). Health-oriented regeneration of industrial heritage: The Boston Innovation and Design Building project. Cities, 105, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102853

Lui, C. W., Warburton, J., & Bartlett, H. (2022). Beyond physical accessibility: A critical review of age-friendly community governance. Ageing & Society, 42(3), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20001117

Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2014). Probes, toolkits, and prototypes: Three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign, 10(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183

Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006

Teo, P., Leng, T. L., & Yang, H. (2019). Intergenerational co-design in high-density urban environments: Lessons from Kampung Admiralty, Singapore. Journal of Urban Design, 24(6), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1625302

Turel, H. S., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2020). A systematic review of participatory design applications in urban aging. Cities, 105, 102980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102980

World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Global age-friendly cities: A guide (Revised edition). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240038040

Xiong, W. (2012). Continuity theory and spatial design for elderly communities. Journal of Architecture, 48(3), 45–52.

Yang, Y. (2010). Research on the construction of age-friendly communities in cities. Doctoral dissertation, Hunan Normal University.

Zhang, Y., & Smith, M. K. (2018). Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for elderly communities: A case study of Zollverein Coal Mine, Germany. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(3), 298–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2017-0042