An Analysis of the Challenges and Countermeasures in Physical Education Curriculum Reform
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Physical education (PE) curriculum reform has become a significant issue in modern educational systems, particularly in the context of improving students' physical fitness and holistic development. However, several challenges have arisen during the reform process. This paper aims to analyze the key issues in PE curriculum reform and propose practical solutions to improve the quality and effectiveness of PE programs.
Materials and Methods: This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining literature review, case studies, and surveys. The sample consists of 200 participants, including 100 male and 100 female PE teachers and students, aged between 18 and 45, from primary, secondary, and higher education levels. The sample was selected using purposive sampling. The research tool used was a questionnaire designed to collect feedback from PE teachers and students about the curriculum reform. Statistical analysis was conducted using mean, standard deviation, and t-tests to assess the differences between different groups.
Results: The study identified several major challenges faced during PE curriculum reforms, including outdated teaching philosophies, insufficient teacher training, unequal distribution of resources, and the lack of innovative teaching methods. These issues hindered the effective implementation of modern PE curricula and reduced student engagement. Furthermore, the analysis revealed that schools with better resources had more successful outcomes in implementing the reforms.
Conclusion: To address these challenges, this paper proposes several countermeasures: enhancing teacher professional development, updating and diversifying the curriculum content, and incorporating innovative teaching methods, especially through the use of modern technology and interactive learning tools. These strategies aim to improve the quality of PE education, increase student participation, promote lifelong physical activity, and ensure that PE programs meet contemporary educational needs.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Abudu, M. A., Wuripe, A., & Abdulai, L. N. (2025). Reform in Teacher Education Curriculum in Ghana: Unveiling the Perception of Tutors of Colleges of Education. International Journal of Advanced Research, 13(1), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/20186
Chaoqun, H., Peng, N., & Zhuonan, H. (2024). The Influence of Physical Education Curriculum Reform on Students’ Physical Fitness: Taking Guangdong University of Foreign Studies as an Example. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(12), 283-290.
Chen, J. (2025). An empirical study on the improvement of students' physical fitness and health in college physical education programmes based on big data. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0343
Foster, D., & Walker, T. (2020). The Role of Technology in Physical Education: A Review of Tools and Methods. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 78-91.
Johnson, M. (2020). Teacher Training and Professional Development in Physical Education. International Journal of Physical Education, 32(4), 201-213.
Latt, M. K., & Wei, G. (2025). How Teacher Efficacy and Receptivity Affect the Perceived Outcomes of Curriculum Reform in Myanmar Basic Education. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e70022-e70022.
McGrath, A. (2020). Bringing Cognitive Dissonance Theory into the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Topics and Questions in Need of Investigation. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6, 84-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000168.
Mitchell, B., & McDonald, L. (2021). Implementing gamification in physical education: Enhancing student participation through competition and reward. Journal of Physical Education Innovation, 18(3), 45–58.
Moreno, P. P. D., Meaney, T., & Herheim, R. (2025). Processes of Recontextualizing a Curriculum Reform into Mathematics Teacher Education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, (prepublish), 1-25.
Ning, Z., & Suqin, H. (2024). Strategies and Practices of Curriculum Reform in Vocational Education Against the Background of Digital Transformation. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 6(9), 1-10.
Smith, P., & Ward, L. (2021). Resource Limitations in Physical Education: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Educational Resources, 17(6), 50-64.
Xu, T., & Hu, J. (2024). Exploring Higher Education Curriculum Reform Under the Wave of Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Mathematics and Systems Science, 7(10), 1-10.
Yang, N. (2024). The Impact and Implications of the Morrill Act on Curriculum Reform in American Higher Education. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 6(6), 39-43.
Yang, Z., & Zhou, H. (2024). On Reconstruction of Teacher Professional Identity in Curriculum Reform for Vocational Education. World Journal of Educational Research, 11(4),1-10.
