Revitalizing Chinese Bronze Mirror Patterns: Educational Integration and Traditional Skill Innovation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Chinese bronze mirrors represent a distinctive cultural heritage spanning multiple dynasties, with patterns embodying cosmological beliefs, social values, and aesthetic principles. The carving and chiseling techniques developed over centuries demonstrate exceptional craftsmanship and cultural symbolism. Despite this rich heritage, contemporary art education has increasingly marginalized these traditional craft elements, endangering both technical knowledge and cultural understanding. This research therefore aims to: 1) To identify and categorize the artistic educational values of Chinese bronze mirror decorative patterns through analysis of historical specimens; 2) To analyze how to integrate traditional Chinese carving techniques into the modern art design education system for design innovation; 3) To document, systematize, and evaluate approaches for the sustainable inheritance and innovative development of traditional Chinese bronze mirror carving techniques.
Materials and Methods: This research uses qualitative research methods, including documentary analysis of historical texts and publications, and field research at Tianyichang Bronze Sculpture Center in Datong, Shanxi Province, China. The process includes structured interviews with craft inheritors, participation in the traditional carving and chiseling production process, documentation through photography and video, and discussions on the feasibility of teaching experiments in art education environments.
Results: The research identified five main educational values of bronze mirror patterns: cultural heritage, craftsmanship, skill development, aesthetic improvement, and creative thinking. The study found that four types of traditional patterns are beneficial for integration into contemporary art and design education. The study proposed a fusion idea that has not appeared in the literature before, providing an educational model to protect endangered traditional skills and promote innovation.
Conclusion: This research establishes a framework for integrating traditional bronze mirror craftsmanship into contemporary art education, promoting preservation and innovation. The findings demonstrate that such integration enhances students' cultural literacy and innovative capacity, ensuring the continuation of valuable traditional knowledge. These insights are valuable for art educators and cultural heritage professionals.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
Aguilera, D., & Ortiz-Revilla, J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
Banas, J. R., & Polly, D. (2016). Instructional design and technology trends in teacher education: An AECT teacher education division special issue of TechTrends. TechTrends, 60, 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0007-2
Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 8. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8
Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Siegesmund, R. (Eds.). (2018). Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315305073
Chen, A. Y. (2019). From revival to prosperity: The Chinese path of intangible cultural heritage protection in the new era. Art Life: Journal of Fuzhou University (Art Edition), (01), 49–59. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:YSSZ.0.2019-01-010
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Dang, L., & Sawatdee, Y. (2025). From social background to artistic expression: The design and cultural value of decorative patterns on bronze mirrors during the Song, Liao, and Jin dynasties in China. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 18(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.69650/jcdrhs.2025.766
Dang, Q., Luo, Z., Ouyang, C., Wang, L., & Xie, M. (2021). Intangible cultural heritage in China: A visual analysis of research hotspots, frontiers, and trends using CiteSpace. Sustainability, 13(17), 9865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179865
DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
Gu, L. (2011). A study on the decorative patterns of the Song, Liao, Xia, and Jin dynasties. Doctoral dissertation, Soochow University. CNKI. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CDFD1214&filename=1012282706.nh
Kong, X. (1992). Illustrated dictionary of Chinese bronze mirrors. Cultural Relics Publishing House.
Lian, Y., & Xie, J. (2024). The evolution of digital cultural heritage research: Identifying key trends, hotspots, and challenges through bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 16(16), 7125. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167125
Mei, L. (2019). Research on the reform of public art practice courses in higher education teacher education programs. Higher Education Journal, 20, 144–146. https://doi.org/10.19980/j.cn23-1593/g4.2019.20.048
Sun, N. (2019). The integration and influence of traditional arts and crafts on modern art design education. Meishu Wenxian, 4, 83–84. https://doi.org/10.16585/j.cnki.mswx.2019.04.036
Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2022). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(11), 2919–2955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943
Yang, C. (2020). Innovative thinking education in contemporary university art design education: A review of Contemporary Art Design Education Exploration. Chinese Journal of Education, (12), 131. https://doi.org/10.19980/j.cnki.1003-2568.2024.02.020
Zhang, F. (2024). Research on the inheritance and innovation of traditional handicrafts in college art education. Times Report (Benliu), 9, 59–61. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:SDBB.0.2024-09-018
Zhang, Y. (2024). The application and practice of intangible cultural heritage in university art design education. Tian Nan, 5, 65–67. https://doi.org/10.19980/j.cnki.1003-2568.2024.05.021
Zhu, J., & Phromphithakkul, W. (2024). The impact of the dimensions of nostalgic culture on the brand equity of Shanxi Chinese time-honored brands. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 4(4), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.4345
Zou, M. (2015). Reform of the public art education curriculum in local universities: A case study of universities in Shaanxi. Journal of Xi’an University of Arts and Science (Social Sciences Edition), 01, 94–96. https://doi.org/10.19980/j.cnki.1003-2568.2024.02.020