Superstar Learning Platform in Vocational Entrepreneurship Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: The rapid integration of information technology in Chinese vocational education necessitates empirical studies on its effectiveness. This study investigates the impact of the Superstar Learning Platform (SLP) within a blended learning framework on entrepreneurial competencies in vocational education. Grounded in constructivist and experiential learning theories, which emphasize active and hands-on learning, this research examines how digital learning tools enhance practical skill development among sophomore Business Administration students at the Digital Business Academy, Zhejiang DongFang Vocational and Technical College.
Methodology: A quasi-experimental design was employed to compare traditional and blended learning approaches in the "Start Your Business" course, a key component of vocational entrepreneurship training. The study measured entrepreneurial knowledge, skills, intentions, and self-efficacy using validated pre-tests and post-tests. A perception survey assessed student engagement, interaction, and satisfaction. Quantitative data were analyzed using statistical software Jamovi, and qualitative insights were derived from student feedback. The study’s design aligns with competency-based education (CBE) principles, which emphasize measurable skill development and practical applications in vocational training. This research encompassed a total of 400 students, with 122 participating in the study through purposive sampling. The cohort was divided into a control group, adhering to traditional teaching methods, and two treatment groups.
Results: Findings indicate that SLP significantly enhanced entrepreneurial knowledge (p=0.002, d=0.76) and self-efficacy (p=0.017, d=0.59) in the treatment group compared to the control group. Entrepreneurial skills showed marginal significance (p=0.055, d=0.48), suggesting that vocational skill acquisition may require additional hands-on training. No significant difference was found in entrepreneurial intentions (p=0.643, d=0.12). Traditional teaching methods also proved effective, as pre-test and post-test improvements were significant in both the control (p<0.001, d=1.02) and treatment groups (p<0.001, d=1.25). Survey results demonstrated that students in the blended learning environment reported higher engagement, interaction, and satisfaction, reinforcing the importance of digital tools in vocational education.
Conclusion: This study highlights the benefits of integrating blended learning in vocational education, particularly in entrepreneurship training. By improving key competencies and student engagement, SLP contributes to a more effective learning environment. These findings provide valuable insights for vocational educators, institutions, and policymakers, supporting the broader adoption of technology-enhanced instructional strategies. Furthermore, this study fills a gap in vocational education literature by examining the role of digital platforms in entrepreneurship courses, emphasizing their potential to enhance job readiness and practical business competencies.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Ahmad, N. H. (2007). A cross-cultural study of entrepreneurial competencies and entrepreneurial success in SMEs in Australia and Malaysia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Graduate School of Business.
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Nincarean A/L Eh Phon, D., Abdullah, A., Ming, G. L., Shukor, N. A., Nordin, M. S., & Baba, S. (2019). Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3433–3466.
Bahati, B., Fors, U., Hansen, P., Nouri, J., & Mukama, E. (2019). Measuring learner satisfaction with formative e-assessment strategies. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 61–79.
Basori, B., Sajidan, S., Akhyar, M., & Wiranto, W. (2023). Blended learning model towards vocational students’ learning outcomes: A scoping review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 205–215.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.
Drnovšek, M., Wincent, J., & Cardon, M. S. (2010). Entrepreneurial self‐efficacy and business start‐up: Developing a multi‐dimensional definition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(4), 329–348.
Drucker, P., & Maciariello, J. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.
Elloumi, F., & Anderson, T. (2007). Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University.
Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(7), 569–593.
Habsy, B. A., Christian, J. S., & Unaisah, U. (2024). Memahami teori pembelajaran kognitif dan konstruktivisme serta penerapannya. TSAQOFAH, 4(1), 308–325.
Helm, B. W. (2025). Cognitivist theories of emotions in philosophy and affective science. In Emotion theory: The Routledge comprehensive guide (pp. 408–428). Routledge.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
Li, B., Sun, J., & Oubibi, M. (2022). The acceptance behavior of blended learning in secondary vocational school students: Based on the modified UTAUT model. Sustainability, 14(23), 15897.
Li, X., & Heng, Q. (2021). Design of mobile learning resources based on new blended learning: A case study of the superstar learning app. In 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Educational Informatization (CSEI).
Man, T. W., Lau, T., & Chan, K. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 123–142.
Minarti, M., & El Hakim, L. (2022). Designing a blended learning system with realistic mathematical education for vocational high school students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 5519–5530.
Mitchelmore, S., & Rowley, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial competencies: A literature review and development agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(2), 92–111.
Previtali, P., & Scarozza, D. (2019). Blended learning adoption: A case study of one of the oldest universities in Europe. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(5), 990–998.
Remeikienė, R., Žufan, J., Gasparėnienė, L., & Ginevičius, R. (2020). Youth unemployment and self-employment: Trends and perspectives. E&M Economics and Management, 23(3), 38–48.
Sala, R., Maffei, A., Pirola, F., Enoksson, F., Ljubić, S., Skoki, A., Zammit, J. P., Bonello, A., Podržaj, P., & Žužek, T. (2024). Blended learning in the engineering field: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(3), e22712.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Shih, R.-C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1048
Siregar, T. E., Luali, N., Vinalistyosari, R. C., Hanurawan, F., & Anggraini, A. E. (2024). Implementation of Vygotsky’s constructivist learning theory through project-based learning (PjBL) in elementary science education. Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(4), 2586–2607.
Stockwell, G. (2016). Mobile language learning. In The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 296–307). Routledge.
Wadhwani, R. D., & Viebig, C. (2021). Social imaginaries of entrepreneurship education: The United States and Germany, 1800–2020. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 20(3), 342–360.
Wan, M. (2023). A case study of EFL blended learning based on Superstar Learning System in China. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 290–303.
Wibowo, S., Wangid, M. N., & Firdaus, F. M. (2025). The relevance of Vygotsky's constructivist learning theory to differentiated learning in primary schools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 19(1), 431–440.
Williams, N. A., Bland, W., & Christie, G. (2008). Improving student achievement and satisfaction by adopting a blended learning approach to inorganic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 43–50.
Yu, Z. (2023). The effects of the Superstar Learning System on learning interest, attitudes, and academic achievements. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(12), 17947–17962.
