Community-Based Tourism Development for Sustainable Tourism Management: A Case Study of the Community in Mae Ai District, Chiang Mai Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: Community-based tourism represents a crucial approach for sustainable economic and social development. Mae Ai District in Chiang Mai Province possesses significant potential through its distinctive Tai Yai culture and outstanding natural resources. However, it currently faces challenges including unbalanced tourism development, unequal benefit distribution, and environmental and cultural impacts. This research aimed to 1) examine the development of community-based tourism in Mae Ai District under Butler's Tourism Area Life Cycle concept and survey the tourism environment, 2) investigate community-based tourism management under collaborative management approaches, and 3) develop strategies for community-based tourism toward sustainable tourism management.
Materials and Methods: The study employed qualitative research methods, including in-depth interviews with 29 participants, focus group discussions with 8 participants, and participant observation conducted over 18 months (January 2023 to June 2024). Key informants comprised 37 participants selected through maximum variation purposive sampling from four groups: Tai Yai community leaders and members (12 participants), tourism entrepreneurs (6 participants), government officials (5 participants), and tourism experts (6 participants). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following a framework combined with content analysis techniques. The analytical process involved systematic coding, theme identification, and triangulation across multiple data sources to ensure credibility and confirmability of findings.
Results: Research findings revealed that Mae Ai District is currently in the Stagnation Stage according to Butler's concept, having progressed through five development phases from 1997 to the present, with 35,000-45,000 tourists annually (based on data from tourism officials, sub-district administrative organizations, and community records). Collaborative management assessment showed varied development levels with four components rated as good (meaningful participation, trust building, joint decision-making, participatory management), five as moderate, and one as fair. Four main stakeholder groups were identified: local communities (high participation), government sector (medium participation), private sector (medium participation), and non-governmental development organizations (low participation). Five main development strategies emerged from stakeholder validation: strengthening community participation, developing management capacity, conserving and developing cultural identity, sustainable environmental management, and creating collaborative networks.
Conclusion: This research contributes new knowledge by expanding the understanding of Butler's theory in the context of community-based tourism in developing countries, demonstrating that community strength and collaborative management can serve as protective factors against decline during the stagnation stage. The integration of collaborative management concepts emerges as a crucial mechanism for sustainable community-based tourism development. The findings provide evidence-based guidelines applicable to similar ethnic communities in northern Thailand and comparable contexts throughout Southeast Asia.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.

References
Abreu, L. A. de, Walkowski, M. da C., Perinotto, A. R. C., & da Fonseca, J. F. (2024). Community-based tourism and best practices with the Sustainable Development Goals. Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 36.
Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(S1), 56–65.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Berkes, F., George, P., & Preston, R. J. (1991). Co-management: The evolution in theory and practice of the joint administration of living resources. Alternatives, 18(2), 12–18.
Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Butler, R. W. (1980). The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources. The Canadian Geographer, 24(1), 5–12.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dangi, T. B., & Jamal, T. (2016). An integrated approach to “sustainable community-based tourism.” Sustainability, 8(5), 475.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Jackson, L. A. (2025). Community-based tourism: A catalyst for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals One and Eight. Tourism and Hospitality, 6(1), 29.
Khownamg, N., Udomraksasup, P. C., Attawongchayakorn, K., & Inthajak, M. (2022). Factors related to community-based tourism management standards in Chiang Mai Province. School of Administrative Studies Academic Journal, 5(2), 66–80.
Krittayaruangroj, K., Suriyankietkaew, S., & Hallinger, P. (2023). Research on sustainability in community-based tourism: A bibliometric review and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 28(9), 1031–1051.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Li, J., Coca-Stefaniak, J. A., Nguyen, T. H. H., & Morrison, A. M. (2023). Sustainable tourist behavior: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2040–2056.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Lo, Y. C., & Janta, P. (2020). Resident’s perspective on developing community-based tourism – A qualitative study of Muen Ngoen Kong community, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1493.
Mae Ai District Office. (2023). Mae Ai District Development Report 2023. Mae Ai District Administrative Organization.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Ministry of Tourism and Sports. (2023). National Tourism Development Plan No. 3 (2023–2027). Ministry of Tourism and Sports, Thailand.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Phuong, N. T. H., Be Ba, N. T., To Quyen, L. T., My Tien, L., & Kieu Lan, M. T. (2023). Research trends on community-based tourism in the period 2013–2023. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 9(3), 159–174.
Poonsuwan, P., & Tantivirun, O. (2023). Sustainable tourism economy: Developing human capital capabilities. Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovation Review, 6(3), 118–127.
Rakpathum, W., Siripipatthanakul, S., Phuangsuwan, P., & Charoenporn, C. (2025). Enhancing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for rural tourism communities: The case of Mae Kampong Village, Chiang Mai, Thailand. SDGs Review, 5(1), 1–15.
Sawangjit, W., Charoenrat, O., Lemtrakul, W., & Chaisongkram, K. (2023). The lesson learned is to enhance the potential of creative community-based tourism based on local identity. Panyapiwat Journal, 15(2), 164–176.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Tourism Authority of Thailand, Northern Office. (2023). Northern Thailand Tourism Development Guidelines. Tourism Authority of Thailand.
Turner, D. W., & Carlson, L. (2003). Best practices for online focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 232–242.