Policy Analysis of the Japanese Academic Evaluation System
Abstract
Background and Aim: This study thoroughly analyzes the 2017 revision of the Japanese "Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) Guidelines for Research and Development Evaluation", exploring its response to the evolving demands of society and technology, and enhancing the scientific and practical aspects of the research evaluation system. The aim is to deeply understand the policy objectives of the evaluation system and its actual implementation in scientific practices.
Materials and Methods: Utilizing document analysis and comparative methods, this research revisits the historical development of Japan's academic evaluation system, particularly focusing on the 2002 and 2017 editions of the guidelines. Moreover, through comparative analysis, the evolution between these versions and their effectiveness in practical applications are assessed.
Results: The 2017 edition of the guidelines emphasizes a problem-oriented approach, focusing more on aligning research with societal needs. Enhancing the transparency and public visibility of the evaluation processes effectively boosts the social value and economic impact of research activities. This edition also specifically supports young researchers by reducing their evaluative burdens and providing a more favorable environment for their scientific careers.
Conclusion: (1) The 2017 edition of the guidelines shifts the focus of the evaluation system towards addressing actual social and technological challenges, enhancing the societal value and economic impact of technological innovations. It also improves the credibility of research activities and public support for scientific funding. (2) In its implementation, Japan has introduced more detailed evaluation standards and a diversity of evaluative bodies, enhancing the comprehensiveness and objectivity of the evaluations. This has led to increased job satisfaction among researchers and sustained research activities. Overall, the implementation of the 2017 guidelines has significantly improved the efficiency and effectiveness of Japan's academic evaluation system.
Article Details
How to Cite
Section
Articles
Copyright & License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Basic Act on Science and Technology. (1995). Retrieved from https://whitepaper-search.nistep.go.jp/white-paper/view/40409.
Fan, Y. (2017). The qualitative transformation of the Japanese academic evaluation system - Establishing a researcher-oriented academic evaluation system. Journal of Beijing University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2, 96-106.
Li, X. (2003). Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology's research and development evaluation guidelines. Science News, 22, 38-42.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2002). Guidelines for the evaluation of research and development. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/gijyutu/gijyutu0/toushin/020701b.htm.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2017). Guidelines for the evaluation of research and development. Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/kagaku/hyouka/1260346.htm.
Motohiro, A. (2006). Changes in the Japanese academic evaluation system: From self-evaluation to third-party evaluation. Journal of the National Academy of Education Administration, 12, 86-89.
Yoshida, K., Takahashi, M., & Nakamura, S. (2020). Enhancing global research competitiveness: The evolution of Japan's academic evaluation system post-2017. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(4), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1759512
Zhang, Q., & Diao, L. (2017). Analysis of the characteristics of the Japanese academic evaluation system. Foreign Social Science, 2, 143-149.
Zhou, W., & Li, Z. (2018). Characteristics and insights of Japanese academic evaluation - Analysis based on the "Outline Guidelines". Journal of Ningbo Vocational and Technical College, 4, 65-68.