Nonlinear Effects of Green Finance on Ecological Welfare Performance in Chinese Provinces
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background and Aim: China faces significant challenges balancing economic development with ecological sustainability. Green finance has emerged as a potential solution, yet previous research has insufficiently examined its nonlinear effects on ecological welfare performance and its interactive mechanisms with other policy instruments. This study addresses this gap by examining the nonlinear relationship between green finance development and ecological welfare performance in China, while investigating previously unexplored interactive effects with environmental regulation, openness, and innovation across different regional contexts.
Materials and Methods: Using provincial panel data from 30 Chinese provinces (2000-2021), we measured green finance development through the Entropy Weight Method, selected for its ability to objectively weight multiple financial indicators. We assessed ecological welfare performance via the Super Efficiency Slack-Based Measure (SBM) model with undesirable outputs, which effectively captures both resource utilization efficiency and environmental impact. Threshold regression and baseline regression models were employed to analyze nonlinear relationships and interaction effects.
Results: Our analysis reveals a significant double-threshold effect of green finance on ecological welfare performance, demonstrating a positive U-shaped nonlinear pattern. As green finance development increases, it progressively mitigates the negative impacts of environmental regulation and economic openness on ecological welfare. Additionally, while green finance amplifies the positive impact of innovation on ecological welfare performance, this synergistic effect gradually diminishes as green finance reaches higher levels. The influence of these relationships varies substantially across eastern, central, and western Chinese regions.
Conclusion: Green finance development demonstrates complex, nonlinear relationships with ecological welfare performance across China. These findings necessitate region-specific policy approaches tailored to different development stages. Policymakers should implement targeted green finance initiatives that account for regional economic structures, environmental constraints, and innovation capabilities to optimize ecological welfare outcomes, particularly in regions with varying levels of economic development and environmental challenges.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any article in the International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews is retained by the author(s) under the under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Permission to use text, content, images, etc. of publication. Any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose. But do not use it for commercial use or with the intent to benefit any business.
References
Busch, T., Bassen, A., Lewandowski, S., & Sump, F. (2021). Corporate carbon and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(5), 1269–1291.
Chen, D. J., & Liu, W. Y. (2023). The impact of urbanization on ecological welfare performance in China: Based on a two-stage Super-SBM model. Jianghan Academic Journal, (1), 86–98.
Chen, G. J., Ding, S. J., Zhao, X. Q., & Jiang, X. Y. (2021). Green finance policies, financing costs, and corporate green transformation in China: A perspective based on central bank collateral policies. Financial Research, 41(12), 75–95.
Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2018). How to integrate environmental, social, and governance issues in investment management: A handbook for investors. Rothman International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 35(2), 54–75.
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Cowan, E. (1999). Topical issues in environmental finance. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), 1, 1–20.
Daly, H. E. (1974). The economics of the steady state. The American Economic Review, 64(2), 15–21.
Deng, Y. J., Yang, X., Chen, G. J., & Wang, K. D. (2020). Spatial imbalance and dynamic evolution of ecological welfare performance in China. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Science Edition), 4, 115–127.
Fang, S. J., & Xiao, Q. (2019). Regional ecological welfare performance levels and their spatial effects in China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(3), 1–10.
Few, R. (1993). Caring for the earth: A strategy for survival. Mitchell Beazley.
Gu, D., & Chen, Y. ((2020). The impact of industrial structure optimization on ecological welfare performance: Empirical analysis based on provincial panel data in China. Price Theory and Practice, 11, 177–180.
Guo, B. N., & Feng, Y. (2023). Can heterogeneous environmental regulations improve ecological welfare performance? A study on the threshold effect based on industrial structure upgrading. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2, 23–30.
Guo, B. N., Lin, J., & Liu, T. F. (2021). The impact of environmental regulations on urban ecological welfare performance in the Yangtze River Delta region. Statistics and Decision, 37(4), 15–18.
Guo, B., & Li, C. (2021). Measurement and drivers of ecological welfare performance in China: An analysis based on provincial panel data. Ecological Indicators, 128, 107825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107825
He, Z. H. (2024). Green finance, carbon emission regulations, and corporate green total factor productivity. Statistics and Decision, 5, 155–159.
Hoti, S., McAleer, M., & Pauwels, L. (2007). Measuring risk in environmental finance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(5), 970–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00522.x
Li, C. Y., Zhang, S. Q., Zhang, W., & Liao, X. C. (2019). Provincial interregional ecological welfare performance measurement and influencing factors in China. Geographical Science, 39(12), 1875–1883.
Li, J. G., & Liu, X. Y. (2024). The impact of green finance on common prosperity: Analysis based on threshold and spatial effects. Forestry Economics, 1–21.
Li, S., Zhao, J., & Da, T. F. (2024). Examination of the impact mechanism of green finance on industrial green development. Statistics and Decision, 14, 137–143.
Lin, M. X., & Xiao, Y. B. (2023). Measurement and mechanism of green finance in promoting high-quality economic development. Contemporary Economic Science, 3, 101–113.
Liu, D., Zhang, F., & Huang, Y. (2021). The impact of green finance on ecological welfare performance at the provincial level in China. Sustainability, 13(11), 6108. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116108
Liu, F., & Chen, Y. (2022). The current situation, problems and countermeasures of green finance development: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Journal of Shanghai Economic Management Cadres College, 2(5), 8-15.
Liu, N., Cheng, Y., & Han, Z. (2021). Temporal and spatial evolution of ecological welfare performance in China and its influencing factors. Journal of Jinan University (Natural Science Edition), (5), 462–472.
Liu, X. H., & Zhuang, X. H. (2022). Measurement of ecological welfare performance levels and influencing factors in Chinese urban agglomerations. Technology Economics and Management Research, (5), 10–15.
Long, L. J. (2019). Evaluation of ecological welfare performance in major Chinese cities: Empirical analysis based on PCA-DEA method and Malmquist index. Exploration of Economic Issues, (2), 69–79.
Long, L. J., & Wang, X. (2017). Evaluation of ecological welfare performance in Shanghai. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(2), 84–92.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Salazar, J. (1998). Environmental finance: Linking two worlds. In A Workshop on Financial Innovations for Biodiversity (pp. 2–18). Bratislava.
Shi, J. (2023). The impact of green finance on ecological welfare performance. China Forestry Economics, 3, 132–136.
Sun, R. (2022). Bidirectional action mechanism of regional economic growth and regional ecological welfare performance. Industrial Technology Economics, 4, 143–151.
Sun, W., & Wang, Z. Y. (2022). The impact of industrial agglomeration on ecological welfare performance in the Huaihe Economic Belt. Journal of Shandong Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 4, 376–386.
United Nations Development Programme. (1990). Human development report 1990: Concept and measurement of human development. Oxford University Press.
Wang, F. R., & Wang, K. S. (2018). [Incomplete citation—please provide full source or page number for proper formatting.]
Wang, R., Chen, P., Zhang, X., & Gao, J. (2010). Ecological footprint calculation and analysis on city scale: A case study of Guangzhou. China Journal of Ecology, 29(5), 761-766.
Wang, Y., & Fan, S. (2007). Income inequality and public spending: Evidence from rural China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 712-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.08.004
Wang, Z. F., & Liu, O. F. (2021). The evolution and influencing factors of spatial network structure of China's provincial tourism efficiency. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 41(3), 397-406.
Wang, Z. F., & Wang, Z. Y. (2021). Spatial pattern evolution and influencing factors of ecological welfare performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: Based on the super-efficiency SBM model. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 30(12), 2822-2832.
Wen, S. Y., Liu, H., & Wang, H. (2022). Green finance, green innovation, and high-quality economic development. Financial Research, 42(8), 1-17.
Xiao, L. M., & Ji, H. R. (2018). Temporal and spatial evolution and influencing factors of ecological welfare performance in China from the perspective of green technological innovation: Data testing based on provincial scale. Science and Technology Management Research, 17, 243-251.
Xiao, L. M., & Xiao, Q. L. (2021). Pattern differentiation and spatial convergence analysis of urban ecological welfare performance in the Yellow River Basin. Soft Science, 2, 46-53.
Xu, W. X., Li, L., Zheng, J. H., & Liu, C. J. (2021). Regional differences in green innovation efficiency and ecological welfare performance in China. Statistics and Decision, 22, 56-59.
Xu, Y. (2017). Environmental efficiency measurement and determinants in China: A non-parametric approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 254-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.077
Xue, H. W., & Kan, L. N. (2024). Measurement and evaluation of green finance development levels in Western regions. Science and Technology Entrepreneurship, 3, 108-112.
Yan, Z. J. (2023). Study on the coupling and coordination mechanism of green finance and economic green development in the three northeastern provinces. Economic Research Guide, (10), 87-94.
Yu, B., & Fan, C. L. (2022). Green finance, technological innovation, and high-quality economic development. Nanjing Social Sciences, 9, 31-43.
Zhang, L., & Li, Y. (2008). Economic development and environmental quality in China: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta. Frontiers of Economics in China, 3(2), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11459-008-0013-x
Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Xue, Y. (2022). Measurement and spatial effect of green finance on ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from spatial econometric models. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(5), 6579-6603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01891-2
Zhao, L., Cao, N. G., Gao, X. T., & Han, Z. L. (2024). Temporal and spatial characteristics and influencing factors of ecological welfare performance in the Bohai Rim region. Economic Geography, 3, 178-188.
Zhao, L., Zhang, H., & Li, M. (2024). Environmental regulation, green innovation and high-quality development: Evidence from Chinese provinces. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(4), 5621-5637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28780-7
Zhou, B., & Li, Y. (2024). Green finance measurement and its ecological spillover effect: Evidence from provincial panel data. Ecological Economics Studies, 2, 44–59.
Zhou, B., & Li, Y. (2024). The impact of the coupling and coordination of green finance and technological innovation on low-carbon economic development. Economic and Management Research, 3, 3-22.
Zhou, X. Y. (2020). Research on the role of ESG indexes in promoting sustainable economic development under the green finance model. China Business Review, 18, 62-63.
Zhou, X., & Tang, X. (2022). Spatiotemporal consistency effect of green finance on pollution emissions and its geographic attenuation process. Journal of Environmental Management, 318(4), 115537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115537
Zhou, X., Tang, X., & Zhang, R. (2020). Impact of green finance on economic development and environmental quality: A study based on provincial panel data from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), 19915-19932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08383-2
Zhu, D., & Qiu, S. (2008). Ecological welfare performance and sustainable development. Ecological Economy, 4, 15–18.
Zhu, J. H., & Pang, W. Y. (2022). The impact of digital economy development on ecological welfare performance. Statistics and Decision, 38(24), 79-83.
Zhu, M., Wang, K. L., & Tang, H. Y. (2022). The spatial spillover effects of green finance development on ecological efficiency: Evidence from resource-based cities in the Yellow River Basin. Financial Development Research, 4, 55-62.
