Analyzing the Relationship between Economic Growth and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions in Thailand: An Application of the VAR Model
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the relationship between economic growth and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in Thailand, a critical issue for promoting sustainable green economic development. The research focuses on understanding the impact of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions on economic growth at both the macroeconomic level and per capita income. The data used in this study includes carbon dioxide (CO2) emission rates, economic growth rates, alternative energy consumption rates, and per capita income, analyzed through a Vector Autoregressive (VAR) model to evaluate the relationships and responses among these variables in both the short and long term. The findings indicate that changes in carbon dioxide (CO2) emission rates have a direct impact on alternative energy consumption. When carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions increase by 1 standard deviation (S.D.), the rate of alternative energy consumption rises in the first year, peaks in the third year, and then gradually returns to equilibrium. Additionally, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions do not have a direct impact on economic growth, both overall and in terms of per capita income. However, an increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions shows only a slight response in economic growth and per capita income rates. The results highlight the necessity of effective economic instruments and public policies to manage environmental risks, enabling Thailand to achieve its goals of Carbon Neutrality and Net Zero Emissions. This can be achieved by promoting activities aligned with the Bio-Circular-Green Economy (BCG Model), which supports long-term sustainability for the country by reducing waste at all stages of economic activities and enhancing the ability to reuse resources.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
บัณฑิต ชัยวิชญชาติ และสุจิต ชัยวิชญชาติ. (2549). ผลกระทบจากการเปลี่ยนแปลงราคาน้ำมันภายในประเทศที่มีผลต่อ ระบบเศรษฐกิจไทย. วารสารเศรษฐศาสตร์ประยุกต์, 12(1), 60-80.
Dinda, S., & Coondoo, D. (2006). Income and emission: A panel data- based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 167-181.
Flavelle, C. (2019). Climate Change Threatens the World's Food Supply. United Nations Warns.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377.
Jayanthakumaran, K., Verma, R., & Liu, Y. (2011). carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India. Energy Policy, 42, 450-460.
Jiranyakul, K. (2018). The impact of environmental policy on Thailand’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: Evidence from dynamic panel data analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(2), 201-207.
Kim, S., Lee, K., & Nam, K. (2010). The relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and economic growth: The case of Korea with nonlinear evidence. Energy Policy, 38, 5938-5946.
Kumar, A., & Yadav, P. (2020). Circular economy practices in Southeast Asia: Implications for sustainability. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 158, 104803.
Lee, C. C., & Lee, J. D. (2009). Income and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions: Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy, 37(2), 413-423.
Liu, Y. (2013). Energy production and regional economic growth in China: A more comprehensive analysis using a panel model. Energies, 6, 1409-1420.
Mitić, P., Kresoja, M., & Minović, J., (2019). A Literature Survey of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Economic Analysis, 52(1), 109-127. DOI:10.28934/ea.19.52.12.pp109-127
Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661-666.
NAT. (2022). Overview. http://nat2022.org/overview.php
NESDC. (2021). Summary The Twelfth National Economic and Social Development Plan. https://www.nesdc.go.th/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=9640
Noor, S., & Siddiqi, H. W. (2010). Energy consumption and economic growth in South Asian countries: A co-integrated panel analysis. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5(14), 921-926.
Saboori, B., & Sulaiman, J. (2013). Environmental degradation, economic growth, energy consumption, and population growth in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 66, 470-479.
Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 48(1), 1-48.
Siriwardana, M., & Kunasena, D. (2015). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in South Asia. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 10(9), 869-875.
Ternald, D. (2020). International Environmental Technology Centre. Annual Report. https://www.unep.org/ietc/resources/report/annual-report-2020
The Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC). (2021). Thai Economic Performance in Q4 of 2021 and the Outlook for 2022. https://www.linkedin.com/company/office-of-the-national-economic-and-social-development-council/
UNEP. (2020). Emissions Gap Report 2020. https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2020
UNFCCC. (2019). Annual report 2019. https://unfccc.int/about-us/annual-report/annual-report-2019
UNDP, S. (2021). Creating a nature-positive future: The contribution of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. New York: UNDP.
Waiyakoon, N., Choonpradub, C., & Sriprom, S. (2021). The bio-economy model and its impact on sustainability in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126233.
World Bank Data. (2024). The world bank Data. The World Bank.