The Influence of Voter Personality Traits on Electoral Decision-Making Toward the Future Forward Party in Thailand

Main Article Content

ปองคุณ รุ่งสว่าง
Komsan Rattanasimakul

Abstract

This research aims to 1) study the personality of voters, 2) study the personality of the Future Forward Party, and 3) examine the personality factors of voters that influence their decision to vote for the Future Forward Party. The study employed quantitative research, specifically survey research. The data collection tool was a questionnaire, and the sample comprised eligible voters across five regions of the country: the North, East, West, Central, and South. Data was collected using quota sampling from two provinces in each region where the Future Forward Party received the most votes, totaling 1,608 participants. Statistical methods used include percentages, means, standard deviations (S.D.), and regression analysis.


The research findings revealed that: 1) The average personality score of the sample group indicated that the "innovative thinking" trait was the highest, with a mean score at a relatively high level (x̄ = 4.78, S.D. = 1.14); 2) The average personality score of the Future Forward Party indicated that the "liberal" trait ranked first, with a mean score at a high level (x̄ = 5.98, S.D. = 1.13); and 3) The personality factors of voters, which include benefit-seeking (X1), sociability (X2), innovative thinking (X3), liberalism (X4), openness (X5), anxiety (X6), mental resilience (X7), independence (X8), and self-control (X9), accounted for 74.70% of the decision to vote for the Future Forward Party.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
รุ่งสว่าง ป., & Rattanasimakul, K. . (2026). The Influence of Voter Personality Traits on Electoral Decision-Making Toward the Future Forward Party in Thailand. Journal of Management Science and Communication, 5(1), ุ65–90. Retrieved from https://so07.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmsc_journal/article/view/5889
Section
Researh article

References

ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ. (2563). “ยุบพรรคอนาคตใหม่”. https://www.thaipbs.or.th/

news/content/289173

สุพัฒน์ สุกมลสันต์. (2553). ขนาดผล: ความมีนัยสำคัญทางปฏิบัติในการวิจัย. วารสาร

ภาษาปริทัศน์, 25, 26-38. https://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Images/asset/

pasaa_paritat_journal/file-25-148-dvkis2254169.pdf?utm_

source=chatgpt.com

Ackermann, K. (2017). Individual Differences and Political Contexts – The

Role of Personality Traits and Direct Democracy in Explaining

Political Protest. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(1), 21-49.

doi:10.1111/spsr.12227.

Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. United State

of America : Rinehart and Winston.

Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G.V., Vecchione, M., Fraley, C.R. (2007). Voters’

personality traits in presidential elections. Personality and

Individual Differences, 42(7), 1199-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

paid.2006.09.029

Burke, E. (2004). His political philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab,

Stanford University.

Cattell, R. B. (2016). Description and measurement of personality.

World Book Company.

Constitutional Court of Thailand. (2020). Constitutional Court ruling

No. 17/2563 (2020). https://www.constitutionalcourt.or.th/

occ_en/download/article/article_20210916111807.pdf

Election Commission of Thailand. (2019). Official results of the 2019

general election. https://www.ect.go.th

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience

sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of

Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.

org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. Kegan Paul.

Fromm, E.H. (1941). Escape from Freedom. New York: Holt, Reinhart

and Winston.

Hiel, A.L., Kossowska, M. (2000). The relationship between Openness to

Experience and political ideology. Personality and Individual

Differences. 28(4), 741-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-

(99)00135-X

Locke, J. (1963). Two treatises of government. Cambridge England.

McConnell, J. V. (1977). Understanding human behavior: An introduction

of psychology. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Smith, G. (2009). Conceptualizing and Testing Brand Personality in

British Politics. Journal of Political Marketing, 8, 209-232. https://

doi.org/10.1080/15377850903044858

Yamane, T. (1963). Statistics: an introductory analysis. New York:

Harper & Row.