The Evaluation of Student Care and Support System Project of Ban Kham School under the Sakon Nakhon Primary Educational Service Area Office 3

Danprai  Seemakam

doi:10.14456/jsasr.2022.41

Authors

Danprai Seemakam Ban Kham School Under the Sakon Nakhon Primary Educational Service Area Office 3, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-7477

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jsasr.2022.41

Keywords:

Project Evaluation; , Student Support System; , Ban Kham School

Abstract

The student support system is one of the processes in the educational administration of educational institutions that will provide assistance to students with clear procedures and tools. Said by the participation of personnel and related networks both inside and outside the school, such as the basic education committee, community parents, administrators, all teachers, etc. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the project of student support system at Ban Kham School under Sakon Nakhon Primary Educational Service Area Office 3 by using the CIPPIEST Model. A total of 220 contributors in this research were involved in the implementation of the project, comprising: (1) 2 project coordinators, (2) The committee of basic education institutions who participated in the project amounted to 7 people, (3) 11 teachers participating in the project, and (4) parents of 200 students participating in the project. Research tools include: Three questionnaires for basic education committees, teachers, and parents were questionnaires on a 5-level estimation scale. And the interview form for the project coordinator is a structured interview. The data were analyzed using frequency distribution statistics, percentage values. Analysis of general data, mean, and standard deviation. Data analysis on opinion level and content analysis for feedback analysis and interview form. The results showed that: (1) The overall contextual assessment results were at the most appropriate level. (2) The overall assessment of inputs is appropriate at a high level. (3) The overall process evaluation results are appropriate at a high level. (4) The overall productivity assessment results are appropriate at a high level; (4.1) The overall impact assessment results are appropriate at a high level. (4.2) The overall efficacy evaluation results were appropriate at a high level. (4.3) The overall sustainability assessment results are at the most appropriate level. And (4.4) the results of the overall transmission assessment are very appropriate.

References

Ban Kham School. (2021). Ban Kham School Self Assessment Report 2021. Sakon Nakhon: Ban Kham School.

Chotwiwuttipong, T., Sikkhabandit, S.,& Onmung, P., (2016). A Development of Information ManagementModel for Secondary Schools. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION. 10 (1), 59-73.

Huekharn, C. (2015). Evaluation. Minutes of academic conferences and presentations of national and international research findings, national groups in education. 3 (6), 116-126.

Jiwcharoensakul, S. (2013). Research Report Assessing Teacher Development Project Using Coaching and Mentoring System Creation Process. Bangkok: Kasetsart University.

Kamyos, W. (2021). Evaluation of the Moral and Ethical Development Project according to the RoyalCharter Education of Banthung Community School (Inme Upratrum). Journal of UBRU Educational Review (Online). 1(2), 1-19.

Nilphan, M. (2011). Assessment of the Doctor of Philosophy Program, Program in Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University. Bangkok: Silpakorn University.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2016). Developing a student care and assistance system. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Association of Thailand Printing House.

Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2019). Policy of the Office of the Education Commission, the fiscal year 2020. Bangkok: Office of Basic Education Policy and Planning.

Phakmongkol, M.. (2021). THE MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR LEVERAGING THE INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE OF RACHANUBAN SCHOOL,THE NAN PRIMARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICE AREA OFFICE 1. Journal of Social Science and Buddhistic Anthropology. 6 (3), 334-350.

Saengnikul, R. (2016). Assessment of the Thai Scientist House Project: A Case Study of Kalasin Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. Master's Degree Thesis in Educational Research and Evaluation. Mahasarakham: Mahasarakham University.

Sakon Nakhon Primary Educational Service Area District Office 3. (2019). Student Support System Operation Manual. Sakon Nakhon: Office of Sakon Nakhon Primary Educational Service Area District 3.

Silo, T. (2015). “PROJECT EVALUATION REPORT UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CARING STUDENTS SYSTEM IN ANUBAN NONGBUA SCHOOL, NAKHONSAWANPROVINCE.” Journal of Arts and Science. 2.(2), 12-23.

Sirirat, S., Chantaranamchu, N., Sungrugsa, N., & Paiwithayasiritham, C. (2015). THE EVALUATION OF BENJAVITHI CREATED WITH THE SAIYAIRAK’S FAMILY TEMPLATETHE LEARNING CENTER UNDER FAMILY LOVE BONDING PROJECT, RATCHABURI. Veridian E-Journal, Slipakorn University. 8(2), 2236-2254.

Sri-saard, B. (2010). Revised Preliminary Research. 9th Edition. Bangkok: Suwiriyasan.

Sukpattanarakun, S. (2015). Assessment of the project of the student support system for schools expanding educational opportunities in Chokchai District, under the Office of Nakhon Ratchasima Primary Educational Service Area 2. Independent Study, Master of Education in Education: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University.

Thongpan, A. (2021). Assessment of a Project to Improve the Quality of Reading, Writing and Analytical Thinking in Basic Education Level Assessment Using the CIPPIEST Assessment Model. Chanthaburi: Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University.

Wiwasukhu, S. (2021). AN EVALUATION OF DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT CARE SYSTEM PROJECT IN CHOM PHRA PRACHASAN SCHOOL, THE SECONDARY EDUCATIONALSERVICE AREA OFFICE 33. Journal of MCU Nakhondhat. 8 (8), 296-310.